Trading Volumes

The turnover in Federal securities regularly reported by the banks of the auction group provides an indicative insight into the structure of the secondary market in Federal securities.

A representative part of the members of the Bund Issues Auction Group voluntarily report their trades in Federal securities (Bubills, Schaetze, Bobls, Bunds, Green Federal securities and inflation-linked Federal securities) - categorized by type of Federal security traded, by region and by institutional form of the trading partner. Based on trading volumes and net positions, this allows the Finance Agency to identify rough structures of the secondary market trading.

For example, a net position of € -22 bn vis-à-vis brokers corresponds to a € 22 bn higher volume of purchases by auction group members from brokers than sales to brokers. The trading data published here are provisional, as later subsequent submissions may lead to corrections.

Annual Comparison of Trading Volumes 2025 vs. 2024

in € BN20242025
(Gross-) Trading Volume6,7387,113
Net Trading Volume337272

In 2025, trading turnover in Federal securities totalled € 7,113 bn. This figure is 6 % higher than the previous year and 3 % lower than the record year of 2005. The volume of outstanding Federal securities also increased by 6 %. The turnover rate, which measures how often a Federal security changes hands within a year, thus remained constant at 4 for the third year in a row.

Funding Instruments 2025

Trading Volume - Funding Instruments

In 2025, three instruments – Federal Treasury notes, 15-year and 30-year Federal bonds – all saw record trading volumes. Trading in 7-year Federal bonds and green Federal securities reached the second-highest level, whilst trading in Federal notes reached the third-highest level since records began. Trading in 30-year Federal bonds saw the sharpest increase compared with the previous year, rising by more than a fifth. Trading in Treasury discount papers fell by a fifth, whilst the decline in trading in inflation-linked Federal securities reached almost 30%. Trading volume of € 41 bn fell short even of the trading volume in the year of their first issue in 2006.

Gross-Trading (in € bn)20242025
Bobl1,4021,389
Bubill628501
Bund7260224
Bund102,4742,714
Bund15196220
Bund30641785
Green117112
ILB5841
Schatz9621,100

Net-trading Volume - Funding Instruments

Net-trading (in € bn)20242025
Bobl4530
Bubill128101
Bund71212
Bund105330
Bund151113
Bund302430
Green1213
ILB-01
Schatz5242

Regions 2025

Trading Volumes - Regions

Trading volume in the euro area has been growing steadily for six years – rising by 12 % in 2025 to € 2.3 trillion, a figure that has now surpassed the previous record levels set in 2005 and 2006 for the first time. Among the regions, only trade with the Arab states saw a stronger percentage increase: by more than a third to € 55 bn – also a new record. By contrast, trade volume with Asian counterparts fell by 6 %. Trade with American counterparts fell by 10 % – yet still represents the fourth-highest turnover volume on record. A strong correlation with the trading activities of hedge funds is evident here.

Gross-trading (in bn. €)20242025
Africa33
United States of America1.1881,067
Arabic states4156
Asia404380
Euro area2.0792,338
Other Europe3.0243,269

Net-trading Volumes - Regions

In 2025, Asia was the standout performer, offsetting declines in other regions: net purchases of € 81 bn represent both the third-highest level on record and almost a threefold increase compared with the previous year. In the euro area, net purchases fell by 7 % to € 106 bn. There were significantly sharper declines in net trade with the Americas, which reversed from purchases of € 35 bn to sales of € 10 bn. From the rest of Europe, net purchases fell from € 160 bn to € 94 bn.

Net-trading (in € bn)20242025
Africa11
United States of America33-10
Arabic states -01
Asia2781
Euro area115106
Other Europe16094

Institutions 2025

Trading Volumes - Institutions

Among institutions, 2025 saw an end to the run of three consecutive record trading volumes for hedge funds. Nevertheless, a slight decline of 4% still represents their third-highest trading volume since records began. Only other investors – in particular retail investors and companies outside the financial sector – suffered a similarly significant decline of 4%.

Trading by brokers, which also includes trading volumes with the finance agency, increased by 22% compared with 2024; pension funds traded 29% more, and central banks 12%. Asset managers, who remain a very significant group, recorded slightly declining turnover in 2025 for the third consecutive year. However, as 2022 was by far a record year for them, their most recent turnover figures still represent the fourth-best result since records began.

Gross-trading (in € bn)20242025
Asset Manager1,6351,595
Banks1,2831,261
Broker1,7542,137
Hedge funds1.2141;159
Pension funds93120
Others6966
Insurances4649
Central Banks644725

Net-trading Volumes - Institutions

In the analysis by institutions, banks rose to become the second-largest net buyers for the first time since 2017, reaching a new record high of 100 bn in the statistics. However, with growth of almost a quarter compared with the previous year, they ranked behind ‘others’, who purchased a net total of 11 bn – 125 % more than in the previous year. Central banks remained the most significant buyers, with 154 bn, 8 % higher than the previous year. An 11 % increase to € 9 bn helped insurance companies set a new record in the statistics; compared with the previous year. 
Pension funds reduced their net purchases by more than half to € 9 bn. Hedge funds shifted from their record levels of the previous two years to move from net buyers to net sellers in 2025, selling € 5 bn to the bidding banks.

Net-trading (in € BN)20242025
Asset Manager8472
Banks78100
Broker-48-78
Hedge funds43-5
Pension funds209
Others611
Insurances99
Central banks147154

Data revisions by the banks of the bidding group may, in certain circumstances, lead to changes in classifications (particularly regarding institutions) and thus also to shifts compared with previous publications